http://cafe.jenkster.com/i_want_tricorder Comments for "I Want A Tricorder" en http://cafe.jenkster.com/i_want_tricorder#comment-8970 <p>w00t!</p> Wed, 14 May 2008 09:15:17 +0100 Kris comment 8970 at http://cafe.jenkster.com http://cafe.jenkster.com/i_want_tricorder#comment-8969 <p>Hmm... the case for an iPhone gets stronger and stronger</p> <p><a href="http://38i.biz/tricorder/ " rel="nofollow">http://38i.biz/tricorder/</a></p> Tue, 13 May 2008 13:08:00 +0100 Bailo comment 8969 at http://cafe.jenkster.com http://cafe.jenkster.com/i_want_tricorder <p>I think we're all agreed - scanning for things is fun.</p> <p>But at the moment, there's simply not enough stuff you can scan for. At the best, you can wander down the High Street and scan for wireless networks and Bluetooth-enabled devices, but <i>it's simply not enough</i>. I want to be able to scan for beta particles. I want to be able to scan for abnormally-high tachyon emmissions. I want to be able to scan for lifeforms, even if it's faster just to count the things that are wearing flip-flops.</p> <p>I want to be able to choose between 'active' and 'passive' scanning, even if active scanning runs a risk of rendering the populous of Hammersmith infertile. I'm willing to take that chance if it means we get better data.</p> <p>I want more data. I need more data. And I need it in a pocket-size device that goes 'bloop'.</p> http://cafe.jenkster.com/i_want_tricorder#comments Geekpost Tue, 13 May 2008 11:12:44 +0100 Kris 1285 at http://cafe.jenkster.com